Man granted parole for his role in the 2001 stabbing deaths of 2 Dartmouth College professors

A man who was convicted for his role in the 2001 stabbing deaths of two Dartmouth College professors has been granted parole after serving nearly two decades in prison. The case, which shocked the small New Hampshire community and the academic world, has been a source of controversy and debate since the tragic events unfolded.

In January 2001, Half Zantop, 62, and his wife Susanne Zantop, 55, were found dead in their home in Hanover, New Hampshire. The couple, who were both professors at Dartmouth College, had been brutally stabbed to death in what appeared to be a senseless and random act of violence. The news sent shockwaves through the tight-knit community, and the police launched a thorough investigation to find the perpetrators.

It was soon discovered that the Zantops had been killed by two young men, Robert Tulloch and James Parker, who were teenagers at the time of the crime. The motive for the killings was later revealed to be a desire for money to fund a cross-country road trip. The two men were quickly apprehended and charged with murder, and both eventually pleaded guilty to the crime.

Tulloch and Parker were sentenced to prison without the possibility of parole, but in a surprising turn of events, Tulloch has now been granted parole after serving 20 years of his sentence. The decision has sparked controversy and reignited debate over the case, with many questioning whether Tulloch has truly been rehabilitated and whether he should be released back into society.

For some, the granting of parole to Tulloch is seen as a second chance for rehabilitation and redemption. Supporters argue that he was a troubled teenager at the time of the crime and that he has shown remorse for his actions. They believe that he has served his time and deserves a chance to reintegrate into society and lead a productive life.

However, others are deeply opposed to Tulloch’s release, arguing that he should have been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for such a heinous crime. They fear that he may pose a danger to society if released and that justice has not been served for the victims and their families.

The decision to grant parole to Robert Tulloch has reignited painful memories of the tragic events of 2001 and reopened old wounds for the families of the victims. While some may see it as a step towards rehabilitation and forgiveness, others view it as a betrayal of justice and a failure to hold criminals accountable for their actions.

As the community grapples with the news of Tulloch’s release, the debate over his parole will likely continue for years to come. The case serves as a reminder of the lasting impact of violent crimes on individuals, families, and communities, and raises important questions about the criminal justice system and the concept of rehabilitation.