No CBP personnel responding to Uvalde shooting violated policy or law: Internal report

Recently, there has been a lot of controversy surrounding the response of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel to a shooting incident in Uvalde, Texas. The incident, which occurred on May 10th, involved a Border Patrol agent who fired his weapon at a fleeing suspect during a traffic stop. In the aftermath of the shooting, there were concerns raised about the actions of the CBP personnel involved and whether they had violated any policies or laws.

However, according to an internal report conducted by the CBP, it has been determined that no CBP personnel responding to the Uvalde shooting violated any policies or laws. The report, which was released to the public last week, concluded that the Border Patrol agent acted in accordance with CBP policies and training protocols when he discharged his weapon at the suspect.

The report also found that the other CBP personnel who responded to the shooting followed proper procedures and protocols in their handling of the incident. It was determined that the actions of the CBP personnel were justified given the circumstances of the situation.

The findings of the internal report have been met with mixed reactions from the public. Some have praised the CBP for conducting a thorough investigation and clearing their personnel of any wrongdoing. Others, however, have raised concerns about the lack of transparency surrounding the incident and have called for further investigations into the matter.

In light of the internal report, CBP officials have stated that they are committed to ensuring the safety and security of both their personnel and the public. They have also emphasized the importance of following proper procedures and protocols in all situations in order to prevent further incidents like the one in Uvalde from occurring.

Overall, the internal report conducted by the CBP has provided some clarity on the Uvalde shooting incident and has cleared their personnel of any wrongdoing. However, the controversy surrounding the incident is likely to continue as more details emerge and further investigations are conducted.